Paps to the Pen

No it wasn’t a rash decision brought about by uncertainty. I can promise you there were many meetings involving many people that occurred before this took place.

Paps wanted to close because that’s where he felt he helped the team best, but he had no issues or problems being a starter either. He was going to do whatever role they asked of him.

I think the most important aspect, and what will be the most talked about part of this move is his health. One of the important points to note here is just how much smarter, and stronger he is, than he was last year.

Since he was hurt last year, like any smart athlete, he has taken the time to get educated on exactly how his shoulder works, and how best to address it and take care of it. The great part about that is that in my experience it’s always taken a major surgery to get young pitchers with unhealthy shoulders to see the light, and that’s not the case here.

That to me is the most important aspect or the major turning point in any young players career. When you get hurt that first time, and you get educated about your arm, things change dramatically if you are someone that has an inner desire to be great, which he does. You get an education that not only allows you to get healthy, but get stronger.

 The other important thing to note is that he’s got a year plus in the big leagues now. After what happened last year, and after talking to some veteran players along the way, he knows that it’s not now, nor will it ever be, a bad thing to tell the manager that you don’t feel ‘right’ that night. Your value comes in being available all year, which for that to happen means you have to be smart about your body.

We’ve got a phenomenal training and medical staff that has put every possible measure in place to keep our arms as healthy and fresh as possible, and because of that I think we’re better today than we were yesterday as a staff, and as a team. 

The other major impact this will have is allowing everyone down in the pen to fall into their ’slot’ and be used in roles they’ve all had success in.

This wasn’t done because we have ‘too much starting pitching’, or because anyone was panicked about who would do what in the pen, it was done because John has worked his ass off to be where he needs to be, to close in the big leagues again. His shoulder feels great, which is priority number one, and him closing for us makes this staff look entirely different for the long haul. Whoever ends up in the 5th spot will be just fine. Julian can do it, Kyle can certainly do it and Johnny is not far from being ready to do it, so there are many options, even though you hope you don’t have to exhaust them all to find the right fit (which I don’t think will be the case).

 P.S. Just an FYI, the story wasn’t “Broke” here, whether you heard it here first or not, it was broken by ESPN. “Breaking news” is not a goal here, hell there isn’t any goal here other than to talk baseball, 38 Studios and do some cool stuff for the Charities that are linked as well as legitimate charities that bloggers who post here are involved in. So put away the conspiracy theories, as fun as they may be.

185 Responses to “Paps to the Pen”

  1. on 22 Mar 2007 at 1:49 pm redsauce

    Where ever he is, I’m hoping he’ll do great. I think it’ll be hard for him to duplicate the season he had last year, but if he’s remotely near it it’ll still be a great season. This does really help the bullpen situation, regardless of what it does for our starting. Good luck Papelbon! (unless, of course, ‘Paps’ is your nickname for Papi)


  2. on 22 Mar 2007 at 1:56 pm dirtdog

    I just don’t like the idea of a young horse pitching 80 innings, maybe 30 of them critical… instead of eating over 200 and competiting for a Cy Young.


  3. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:01 pm petesuncle

    Curt,
    Thankyou so much for your support and encouragement to my nephew, Peter. I just returned from a visit with Pete and his family this week and can tell you that you are making a significant positive impact in the little man’s life (and our whole family).

    You can be assured that you will have many Cardinal fans watching you this year - 4 Pete’s Sake.

    Blessings on you and your family (and the dogs)


  4. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:03 pm jeff124

    Curt,

    This is not at all related to anything so I’m not sure I’m putting it in the right place, so…..

    The day after Randy Johnson hit the dove in the spring training game you were warming up in the bullpen at TEP for your start. Between pitches you glanced up at me/us and I took the opportunity to smart-alec, “You will have to hit a humming bird to beat that dove thing.” or something close to that.

    I couldn’t read your reaction, whether you thought it was funny, ignorant, etc. As I took my seat for the game it occurred to me that perhaps I had crossed a line.

    Is your warmup in the bullpen ever affected by dumb-ass fans like myself?


  5. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:03 pm GremEQ

    I can say that I am dissappointed with this move. I was looking forward to Pap in the rotation, and think he could be a consistant 17 - 20 game winner.

    I know he will do good again the bullpen, but I think it is easier to find a closer than to find a top of the rotation pitcher.

    Quite honestly, he is one of four top of the rotation pitchers the Red Sox have.

    Oh well. Hopefully he doesn’t break down again, like he did in August last year.


  6. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:05 pm fpraven4

    Curt,

    obviously the Red Sox have to have some other moves in mind by moving Pap back to the pen. Julian Tavarez is not going to be the long term answer so does this possibly pave the way for Clemens to come back to Boston? Is it time to start selling ice cream?

    Jeremy


  7. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:06 pm soxfangermany

    That are great news and i read it first on your blog curt. If all the starters are healthy through the season and the bullpen stand up,everything is possible. Now the last hole is closed with pap closing again, i have a good feeling about this season.
    And by the way: Great blog!


  8. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:07 pm tymmyramone

    I admit I got psyched at the prospect of seeing what he could do for 200+ innings, I kindof had the feeling this would happen all along. I just figured it’d be closer to October or coinciding with the return of Lester….or a Clemens signing.

    When a guy is that good in that role and he’s physically able to do it, they’d be silly not to roll the dice with the guy who did so well at it. No disrespect to the other options, of course.


  9. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:08 pm Kaz

    Good to hear your insider thoughts on this. I worried for Paps when I heard this news an hour ago. I know he had come out earlier in training saying that he was really happy to be starting and felt that’s where he was helping the most. I also think if Tavarez is moved up to the rotation in the 5th spot, it would really benefit himself and the team. He always looked like he was trying to overdo it when he was pitching in relief. That led to loss of command and tons of hits off of him last year. The few times he went into long relief (there was a long extra innings game mid-season that really sticks out in my mind), he did a _lot_ better on the mound and it felt like he was pacing himself better because he knew he had to go 3 innings instead of 3 outs. I had a lot more confidence in his performance when he knew he was going to be needed for more than 15-20 pitches.

    But if you’re saying that Papelbon is happy with this development, then as a fan, I feel a lot better about the team too. It’d be nice to see the baseball ops guys support Papelbon with this decision by working hard to find a permanent closer worth their mettle before the deadline. Bring in a proven closer and move Papelbon up to starter and I think he’ll be happy to contribute how he thought he would 3 weeks ago when he was all fired up and focused on starting and the team will be even better than it looks now with him back in the closer role to start the season.


  10. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:09 pm sholdsie35

    Curt,

    Do you as one of the starters have any input in this decision? Does the coaching staff and general manager ask your opinion on decisions like this?

    Thanks


  11. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:12 pm bopes

    I think all of us agree that the team is stronger with JONATHAN in the ‘pen, but I think there are a couple things to consider. First, I was excited to see him start and mix in a different array of pitches, but that’s because I did not think that finding a slam-dunk closer was that important. Name the guys who are at the back end of the bullpen and are slam-dunks, you can count them on one hand. Todd Jones had over 30 saves last year, you’re telling me we couldn’t find someone to do that while we at least see how dominant Papelbon could have been in the rotation? I know that in the regular season, maybe having that go-to-guy isn’t a necessity, but come playoff-time, look at the teams who made it last year and they all have one, so I could be wrong. The other thing about Detroit is that bullpen was lights-out all year outside of Jones. So basically I’m contradicting myself in this paragraph, but I think these are all important things to consider given the decision.

    The other question is, does this mean the Sox were blowing smoke about being on a daily routine for his shoulder to maintain long-term health? Even if Papelbon learned about how to strengthen his shoulder regardless of a specified role, will he be as effective a closer as he was last year if say, he can’t go three consecutive days like some closers need to? So the question is not, would you rather have a dominant, one-of-a-kind closer over a starter who could win 16-18 games, because we would all prefer a Rivera-esque closer. But if he cannot do what he did last year to be that guy, do you now value a potential 16, 17, 18 game winner more than a closer who can’t go on 2, 3 consecutive days? I’m sure they have considered this and created some valuation process for that, but I’m curious.


  12. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:12 pm soxtall12

    Curt,

    You are straight with us so I want to be straight with you. This whole Pap to the closer thing, it seems like a lot of ’spin’ to me. This is the first blog I felt like you were defending a corporation policies, rather than being straight up with us. I know that you can anticipate the feedback and backlash that will follow this decision. My question is, why do the Sox would put of the information about his health in the first place? Why not leave the possibility open, take the Bill Belicheck model…if they can play, they can play…”it is what it is”

    It just comes off very disingenuous when the organization changes its mind after insisting for months that starting would best for Paps health.

    Regardless, I think this is smart move. (and I love your blog)


  13. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:14 pm sroll

    Mr. Schilling:

    Thanks for the insight, but please stop patronizing your readers. We all know that Papelbon was returned to the closer role because none of the other candidates demonstrated they could do the job. Thankfully, we have more options at the end of the rotation.

    Finally, how long does it take you to craft the paragraphs in your blog? I’m a bit nervous that it takes you hours thereby reducing your work-out time. Please assure me that your writing habit does not detract from your training schedule.

    Thank You.


  14. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:16 pm miked714

    Hey Curt,
    Great insight, as always. Is this move more motivated by the lack of success by the closer candidates or by the success of Kyle Snyder (who we would lose on waivers if sent to Pawtucket) and Jon Lester in Spring Training? Either way, AWESOME to have a quality closer again this season!


  15. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:16 pm hedgehogbiff

    WOOT! Thanks for breaking the news.


  16. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:16 pm banty19

    I don’t know how much input you have on this, but please ask the powers that be to get him back in the rotation. I don’t know about everyone else but I’d rather see 6-8 good innings every 5 games than 1 great inning every few games. If it’s better for his arm to be a closer then my view might change. But I don’t think it is (except maybe because he’ll throw fewer breaking balls).


  17. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:17 pm nychoke

    Hey Curt -

    You’ve obviously improved the pen with one of the top closers in the game, but you’ve also weakened your rotation. No disrespect to Pap’s replacement, but he won’t be at the same (perceived) level. Are you a better team with this move?


  18. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:19 pm unkelaaron

    I think it’s in the best interest of “The Team” to have that closing spot solidified by a pitcher with the makeup of Papplebon. Even though I understand that you probably feel good about your bullpen, and have trust in all of the pitchers, what kind of affect does having somebody like Papplebon at the end of the game have mentally on a starting pitcher?
    Great blog Curt, thanks for the unfiltered insight, Here’s hoping that you finish your career with the BOSOX!


  19. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:20 pm Ernie

    Hmmm, so Paps is the closer now. Very interesting. I have been waiting to see how this closer situation was going to play out. To be honest I was looking forward to seeing Jon in the starting rotation this year, but that is cool that he is about doing what is best for the team. And it is good that we now have a nails closer in Pap so you can’t complain about that.

    Also funny that I got the news here first :)

    I wonder, hypothetically, should the Sox acquire a closer at some point this season, is is possible to move Pap back to the starting rotation, or is that kind of change too jarring for his arm to adjust to?


  20. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:21 pm rpalmer63

    Good to know. Lets hope he doesn’t overwork his arm. With his experience he will know his limits better and with the medical attention he gets he is less likely to re-injure it (lets pray). I was looking forward to seeing his start, but I have no problem with him going back to the closer’s role. If you guys are gonna be looking to go deep into the playoffs, then you are going to need to have someone you can rely to finish games.

    So who is going to start now? I personally like Lester to fill the role. He has some accuracy problems, but he’s still so young. If not Lester, then are the Sox going to look to acquire another starter? Julian showed he was pretty capable at the end of last year. But I like Jon Lieber, who was delegated to the pen by the Phillies and was in trade rumors for awhile. It’s unfortunate for him because his home field is a terrible pitcher’s park. Other than the dingers he gives up he is an underrated pitcher. He gets a lot of ground balls, which would be a good fit for the solid infield you guys have. He also has great command of the strike zone (very good K to BB ratio, 4.17, but certainly not yours). He doesn’t want to be a reliever, so I’m sure he would be more than glad to start for a winning team like the Sox.

    One question: Why do so many players give autographs and are much more amiable with the fans during spring training and not so much in the regular season. There’s the obvious reason: it’s spring and maybe a more loose. But during the regular season do the players have routines that they follow and don’t want to break them? Just wondering.


  21. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:22 pm mcq0823

    I think this is a mistake. It is better for the club to get 200 innings out of a guy like Paps then have him pitch only 70 innings

    The kid has a chance to be a top level starter and it makes no sense for him to be a closer. If Nathan got injured, would the Twins put Santana? Would the Cardinals move Carpenter to the pen?

    It makes no sense.

    Unless…………..Clemens is coming back to the rotation. If Clemens comes back, well then, great move. As good as Lester, Snyder and Julian can be, they don’t posses the stuff and potential of Papelbon. The end of the game is important, however unless their is some master plan we are aren’t aware, this just doesn’t make any sense.

    I am not a fan of this move


  22. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:22 pm jasvlm

    This is actually probably welcome news for the team, as the distraction of the constant “Who will close” questions tend to be a downer. That said, I feel like the value of a starter, in terms of sheer innings pitched, will outweigh the value of a closer, but that is only my opinion.
    Here is my question: Since the 5th slot in the rotation tends to get skipped some early in the season, it is reasonable to imagine that the Sox are grooming that 5th slot for Lester once he gets healthy enough to take it, filling in with Snyder, Tavarez and perhaps even Pineiro? I know Pineiro hasn’t been groomed to throw starter’s innings this spring, but perhaps he could be an option there as well in mid-April. I’m just speculating, and I appreciate your insight as to the decision making process the club goes through.
    Here is one follow up question: How does the rest of the team react to this decision? Much was made of Papelbon’s health driving his return to the rotation, making it less risky for his shoulder. Do the players look at this as if the organization is making a decision that might not be in the best interests of the player’s health long term, just to fill a short term need? I am not trying to create a controversey, or fuel a fire with that question, I am just looking for the feel you have about that situation. No disrespect to Theo or any of the braintrust implied there. As someone with a medical background, I’m not convinced that starting is easier than closing (from a stress on the joint standpoint), or that any study has been shown that illustrates such a fact. The element of a routine is certainly salient, but it comes down to the strength and the stability of the joint, and those factors will be challenged more by fatigue and muscle overuse than any other single factor-whether it be as a starter or closer.
    Thanks again, Mr. Schilling, for the great access to your thoughts and the inner workings of our favorite club. It is truly a wonderful blog.
    JAS


  23. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:23 pm mcq0823

    The sox can’t be sure Clemens will come back. I think everyone here will agree if Clemens was coming back,move Papelbon back for 1 more yr. Have a rotation of Clemens, Schill, Beckett, Dice-K and Wake…….


  24. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:24 pm ridetheseal

    Thanks for the insight, Curt. Although I was very curious to see Paps in the rotation to see what he could do, this is the biggest need on an otherwise championship caliber team. If he’s healthy and wants to do it, I think this is where Paps can add the most value.

    And perhaps this opens the door for The Rocket at some point?


  25. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:25 pm fenwaynationchief

    Curt-

    Does the move of Paps to the ‘pen make a Clemens acquisition for the 5th starter (in May or June) more likely?

    -FenwayNationChief


  26. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:25 pm rknowlesjr

    Thats great news for all Sox fans. With Curt, Josh and Dice K all possible 20+ game winners, toss in 15 from Wake and a dozen or zone from the #5 spot (whomever he is). The Yankees and Blue Jays should be shaking in their boots.


  27. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:26 pm bosoxn1

    Hey banty19, sorry but those 6-8 inning are gonna go to waste if you don’t have anyone to close those games. We still have several candidates for that fifth spot, including Gabbard, Snyder and Lester. I would put Gabbard in there until Lester is ready and keep Snyder in the bullpen for long relief and spot starter, besides he doesn’t have more options.
    Paps in the closer spot is big sign of relief, I personally love it!


  28. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:27 pm scambodian

    Curt,

    Just here to set the record straight.
    First off i am not fascinated with you trust me on that. I was reading an article on you or the pitching staff on WEEI.com and it refernced your blog so i came on to take a look, and the overwhelming nuthugging that was going on was completley ridiculous, and almost made me a little sick.

    The truth is i actually have a ton of respect for you as a ball player i think your nasty. I’m not gunna lie i disagree with some of your stances on a personal level but that is neither here nor there. I was just being over the top ridiculous with my views and posts to just try to play devils advocate to what was going on in this site. You can say a lot of my posts were wortless (which they were), but so are half the nuthugging posts that claim you were the first man to walk on the moon, and making you out to be the son of Zues. Was i trolling? absolutley, but hey whatever.

    Now for my first serious piece of information.

    I think pap is going to be one hell of a starting pitcher the kids a stud no doubt, but he also proved that he can be an all world closer. You have a problem this year, too much starting pitching (which never really is a problem) and no closer. Like you said the guys in the pen could get the job done, but no where near as effective as Pap could be. One more year for Pap as a closer then back to the rotation. My baseball career ended in college so im not gunna pretend like im a genius but it does seem like the logical thing to do.

    Thanks and GOD BLESS SCHILL

    Yours truley The SCAMBODIAN

    i made an apology, but i am still at war with you Deane.


  29. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:28 pm pops821

    I don’t share the sentiment that this is a panic move by the Red Sox that’s reacting to the absence of one guy asserting himself as closer-material. The Red Sox don’t do ANYTHING without asking Bill James about it first. But no, in all seriousness, this front office and coaching staff analyzes and deeply evaluates every move they make as much as, and probably more than, every other team in the league.

    Really, I look at this news and say to myself “This makes too much sense…something must be wrong” (maybe I still retain my fatalistic instinct as a Sox fan despite 2004). Papelbon was historic last year in the closer role; Papelbon is healthier as a pitcher than he’s ever been, including last year; Kyle Snyder is healthy for the first time EVER and has had a real good spring; Jon Lester is coming back stronger than anyone could have reasonably expected and it’s probably safe to assume he’ll be ready if someone in the rotation does go down at some point (God forbid).

    Yeah, this move could weaken what so many talking heads declared as the best rotation in baseball, but since when has the preseason consensus view EVER been right about ANYTHING? Fact is, this is a stronger team with Papelbon closing than with anyone else closing…not for anyone else’s lack of talent but almost the opposite: the closer candidates have been very good, or have excelled, in middle relief roles in the past, but cannot claim the same success in the closer role. This move makes sense.


  30. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:28 pm ike6116

    Personally, I love this move. Papelbon was as we all know amazing as a closer last year and as much talent as he has and as effective as he could be as a starter (which I dont question he could be any team’s ace) there is something just great about having that kind of weapon to close out games. Teams just HAVE to get demoralized when they go into the 9th trailing with Paps in the pen.

    I just hope Josh can turn it on this year. I won’t presume to have much baseball knowledge but from watching last year it seemed like Josh didn’t realize he was in the AL east and that challenging arguably the best hitters in baseball down the middle with heat might not be the best strategy, especially once they’ve seen you a couple times. I hope that since you like him so much and vice versa that you might have been able to impart some veteran wisdom and he does more pitching and less throwing this season. I could be wrong here but to your average sox junkie glued to NESN throughout the summer that’s what it looked like to me.


  31. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:29 pm rick27

    I hope I’m wrong, but I’m not too happy about this, Curt. If I recall correctly, when Paps was named the team’s closer last year you said on WEEI that you’d rather have him start and get 200 inning out of him. Maybe you said that before you saw him dominate as a closer, but why the change of heart? It seems to me that Sox management said, “It’s best for his arm for him to start.” Now they say, “Forget about what we said earlier; it is no extra risk on his arm. He is going to close again.” Obviously, John has the stuff and the makeup to close or start. I care very little about which role he’s in. I just want him healthy two or three years from now, still in his prime, and wearing a Sox uniform.


  32. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:29 pm weeba

    Thanks for confirming the news. Gotta love news reporting nowadays. Why wait for ESPN or Boston.com when you can get a player confirming it before it officially happens?


  33. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:31 pm timlin50

    //Oh well. Hopefully he doesn’t break down again, like he did in August last year.//

    If I’m not mistaken, Papelbon got hurt in the September 1st game.

    And for those of you snapping at Curt for ‘defending’ this move, step off. Regardless of why the decision was made, for the needs of the team, Curt obviously thinks this is the right way to go.

    You can’t honestly think he’d go against himself, on his own blog, to ’suck up’ to management.


  34. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:31 pm bosox47

    Who is going to be the fifth starter

    lester?
    pinero?
    tavarez?


  35. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:32 pm brendinater

    I would love to be sycophantic and say I completely agree with you but unfortunately I cannot. From a selfish standpoint, it is great to see him back there in the closer role. However, I cannot get past the fact that the whole reason for his move to the rotation in the first place was on doctors’ orders. Maybe something has changed in this regard. I also have my doubts about the ability of the management to maintain, all year long, the “we don’t want to overuse him” approach. Fans have short memories, and it will not be long before people are baying for blood when Paps isn’t used in a save situation and someone else comes in and blows it. The pressure will be there to use him a lot, purely because he is so good.

    That said, I really hope I am proved wrong. The bottom line is that there’s a young pitcher who has the potential for a great and long career, and I sincerely hope that is not jeopardized by this move.


  36. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:33 pm reluctantyankee

    As someone who has done both, is there more strain placed on the shoulder in a closing role (pitching fewer innings more often), or in a starting role (pitching more innings less often)?


  37. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:33 pm acefox1

    I don’t know what to think really, except to say that you are in the club-house and we’re out here. If Paps says he’s happy being the closer and it’s the best thing for the team right now then I’m fine with it.

    My personal hope was to see him continue showing the brilliance he showed as a starter at the end of the 2005 Season and be developed as a top-of-the-rotation stud for the sad day when you do decide to hang em up.

    I don’t think that you are trying to spin this news for the fans though and I completely believe your take on the situation. And I agree that this decision will help everyone settle into roles where they are most comfortable.

    I think Tavarez surprised a lot of us as a spot-starter last year. It seems like the more innings he knows he’s going to pitch, the more effective he is. Kyle Snyder would be great oo from what we’ve seen so far. it would be a shame to lose him to another team just because he’s out of minor-league options. Does this decision change anything regarding a 25 man roster spot for Kyle?

    Thanks for being a straight-shooter Curt and giving us the straight-dope. I know you’ll probably have a lot of flack thrown at you for selling the Front Office party-line to the fans but I’m not one of those people.

    Thanks again and keep the good stuff coming!

    Deane


  38. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:34 pm mondattingly

    Speaking of the pen, I was curious the other day when you were talking about power fastball pitchers having difficulty with their changeups. What do you think of Mo Rivera starting to throw his changeup a bit more this Spring? I know you’re not here to talk about the opposition, but from a Pitcher to Pitcher standpoint, does it intrigue you?


  39. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:37 pm niskayuna

    Curt, I don’t understand why you think it’s appropriate to blog about this before the team has made an official announcement??


  40. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:39 pm johngilligan

    Curt,
    I think this is great news. Personally, I was a bit concerned with Jon in the rotation. I just don’t think he has the tools to face batters 2 or 3 times during the course of a game and keep them guessing.

    We have to hope that Jonathan has built up his arm/shoulder strength and that that he will keep an open dialog with the Sox staff about how he is feeling.

    I really hope John Lester’s progress continues as I feel he will be an asset to the team later on this season.

    Thanks Curt!


  41. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:39 pm maranara

    I am thrilled with the news. Paps seems like a great kid (I had the opportunity to talk with him in Sept. ‘05 when he was a call-up, and I was so impressed), and he really shined as the Sox closer last year. He seems to have the intensity and mindset to close, and it’s really good to know that at least one member of the starting staff is supportive of the decision to move him back to that role. It also makes me hopeful that Lester is closer to being at full-strength then we all think. I’m sure that my hope that he is back and pitching this year is only a fraction of what you guys (his teammates and those who actually know him) feel.


  42. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:40 pm educatedcheese

    Cool beans!

    Now could you please use your superhero powers to speed up time so tomorrow can be April 2 and we can just get this season started already?!


  43. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:46 pm tr0mbley

    I certainly don’t mind having Papelbon as the closer. There’s nothing more comforting than having a lead in the 8th and seeing a Rivera-type closer warming up. But I think most fans were excited to see what Paps was capable of as a starter. I was REALLY looking forward to Schilling, Beckett, Matsuzaka, Papelbon, Wakefield. If that rotation pitches in the NL, I bet you’re looking at 75+ wins from them alone.

    So what’s next? Is Tavarez the guy in the 5th spot? Or is Lester the next in line. I liked the way Lester battled last year. A bright spot of Papelbon heading to the pen is that Lester now has a chance to enter the rotation again.


  44. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:47 pm behrle

    Hey, Curt–

    It’s cool that Pap is so flexible about this: and I think he brings a lot to the table. As long a Tito doesn’t overuse him (I remember him saying he’s young, he can bounce back, he can go two innings here and there). SOMEONE ELSE ALSO HAS TO STEP UP AND GET OUTS. This mean you Craig H. and Manny D.. Young talent is only worth something if it matures. And Pap threw his arm to rag last year cleaning up other pitcher’s messes.

    –jimmy


  45. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:51 pm largermass

    Are you getting the green light from the FO and coaching staff before you make their internal decisions public information here in your blog and before they release a statement? I certainly hope so.


  46. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:52 pm nxouris38

    Hey Curt, If you get a chance, I’d be interested to hear your take, as a professional player, on the new school line of thinking in regards to the value of a 200 IP starter vs. a 75 IP closer.


  47. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:54 pm keysersose

    Curt,

    I truly find myself torn by this information… on one hand, I believe in the whole “never look a gift horse in the mouth”, and hands down Paps as a closer was OUTstanding… and as Bill Simmons argued, he has the potential to be one of the best closers in baseball for sometime to come, so how do you put him in the rotation… conversly, he’s constantly reminded me a lot of yourself when he pitches, just maybe not the best curveball, or the hardest fastball, but damn it, if he just has “it”, like you, and could be such a dominant force in the rotation… either way, just made the season a whole lot more interesting….

    thanks

    D


  48. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:55 pm baseballticket

    I don’t get it. I understand what you’re saying about the eduction of his medical condition and everything, but they spent a great deal of time and energy last fall educating us that he should never ever be a closer again. I hope this is the right move. He’ll be great as a closer and now we have a great pitching staff… but it’s going to take a long time for me to un-learn what they taught me last fall. I just don’t know who to trust now.


  49. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:55 pm smackdown924

    You guys are missing it. Yes, it would be nice to have another 200 innings power pitcher, but a good team NEEDS a closer. The guy in the bullpen who can shut the door is an absolute necessity. I feel much more comfortable with Papelbon there than anyone else. The kid has the mental and physical makeup to be a closer. That is a rare thing. Now all we have to do is have Tavarez start a few times, maybe Snyder. Once Lester is ready to go, he can be a very decent 5th starter. A closer who throws 80 innings but has a 1.7 ERA and 35-40 saves, and saves critical games is just as important as a starter who can go 6-7 innings every 5th day with an ERA in 3.8-4.5 range. You must understand that.

    I agree with Curt, the main thing here is health. If he’s healthy, he’s strong, and he’s on board with closing, I say we pull the trigger. If there’s any reservations about any of those things, then play it safe. I think we just made our team better.


  50. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:55 pm ham228737

    Most people don’t realize that the injury Jon Papelbon has is something he will always be concerned with. The tendons in the shoulder are stretched to the point that his shoulder subluxates or pops out of the shoulder joint. To keep this from happening he has two choices. Do physical therapy daily to strengthen the muscles around the shoulder to keep the shoulder stong and hopefully from coming out of it’s socket or have an operation to shorten the the tendons and keep the shoulder from coming out of the socket.

    That being said I think his best move would be to the bull pen instead of trying to start and throw 200 plus innings at this point in his career.


  51. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:56 pm tpetey

    I’m hoping this is just a one year postponement to Paps’ permanent move to the rotation. If Bryce Cox and his “nastiest slider on Earth” don’t fall off the planet in Portland this year and if Craig Hansen rediscovers the nastiness in his own slider, we’ll have more closers than we can use (this is a good thing).

    I understand the stated rationale, but it smells to me like a panic move. Paps will be … what? three-fourths of a closer? No more 3-in-a-row appearances and no more two inning saves. Lots of save opportunities will wind up in the hands of the “unchosen”, so I hope management’s firm vote of “no-confidence” in them doesn’t come back to bite them. I seriously can’t see how the team is more than marginally better off with Paps at the back of the bullpen.

    Best wishes to Kason Gabbard and/or Kyle Snyder. I hope they take the opportunity and run with it, because a huge hole has just opened up at the end of the rotation. I was worried that Theo would make a panic trade, and it appears he has: he’s traded a potentially dominant starter for a dominant (albeit part-time) closer — and potentially increased his risk of injury in the bargain.

    Go Sox!


  52. on 22 Mar 2007 at 2:56 pm jayp849

    While I would normally agree that it is better to get 200 innings out of a pitcher than to get 70-80 innings out of him, this is not a normal situation. We have to remember that Papelbon threw out a .92 ERA last year, think about that for a second, less than 1 run per nine. Think about the fact that this team has a payroll in the $150-160 million range and a legitimate chance to win a world championship. This is also a team that has three aces essentially with Curt, Beckett (who I think is going to have a huge year) and Dice-K, as well as a solid veteran in Tim Wakefield who posts double digit victories every year. They HAVE to have someone be able to close out those tight games and in my opinion there is no better option than Jonathan Papelbon to close games for the Boston Red Sox. Think back to ‘03 for a minute, remember Chad Fox, Bobby Howry, Alan Embree etc. trying to close games. Think about how many games Pedro would’ve won that year had they had a solid closer, not even a great closer, a solid one. In Papelbon, you have a GREAT closer. Now think about ‘04, how did everyone feel when the bullpen door opened and Keith Foulke stepped out, game over. How about last year? Paps comes in, game OVER!! Thats a great feeling for us, imagine how Curt, Josh, and Dice-K will feel when they come out of a game with a lead and know that they can turn that lead over to Jonathan Papelbon. Great move by the Sox, they should be commended.


  53. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:00 pm 0chris0

    Curt,

    Thank you for everything you have done on the field, I appreciate it as a life long fan. That said…

    I can’t help but cringe every time you get behind a keyboard or a microphone. I understand you are an outspoken person, but above all else you are a professional athlete, NOT a “blogger” trying to be the first to break the latest information. If a fan, somehow, got his hands on this info and posted it on the internet…that would be one thing. But you are not only a professional athlete, you are also an employee of the Boston Red Sox. Don’t you think it would have been a tad more professional to wait until the team held their traditional press conference announcing this move? I can’t imagine myself being privy to some information at my workplace and running to the internet to post about it before my company had a chance to make said information public. I know that other news outlets have already reported this move, but they are not employed by the Red Sox. I just think that when it comes to “inside info” on YOUR team, you should maybe wait until the team has the opportunity to go public through their normal channels. Unless I am completely mistaken and the Red Sox appointed you the new publicist and they expect you to bring this news to the fans.

    I mean no disrespect to you, I just feel that baseball players should play baseball. You make yourself accessible to the fans like no other player in the game, but that can be as much as a curse as it is a blessing.

    As far as the “news” goes, I keep thinking the same thing to myself; how dominate would the Yankees have been throughout the 90s if it wasn’t for Rivera? As much as I would love to see what Jon can do as a starter, I think having a dominate closer is more important in the overall scheme of things.

    Thank you.


  54. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:01 pm elviselvisberg

    First off, Curt, this blog is the best. Thanks for reaching out to the fans like this.

    This move makes the Sox a better team. All of a sudden there’s an all-star caliber closer and a solid surrounding cast in the ‘pen, and 3 potential aces, a franchise legend, and a lot of very good options for the 5th slot.

    He has to be cautious about that shoulder, though, and the Sox have to do whatever it takes to keep him healthy.


  55. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:01 pm sebagobill

    Paps is BETTER than Dick Raditz was — that kind of closer is way more important than “another” starter. Paps can/will be a GREAT starter someday but this is the best thing for the team right now. Paps is a team player of the same caliber as Troy Brown. I’m a very long time Sox fan and I don’t remember starting a season as excited as I am this year about the possibilities for 2007.


  56. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:02 pm ryebrook1

    This is the absolute right move. Bottom line is the Sox have 4 solid starters and Lester will be back soon. If not, Snyder or Tavarez are very serviceable. They haven’t found a guy that can close and the market for middle relievers is sky high. Oh, and by the way, Papelbon was one of the best closers in baseball last year. You just don’t replace that so easily.

    Steve Phillips made a number of very sensible comments on yesterday’s ESPN telecast backing this move. If the fifth starter is 8-12, a team with Schilling, Beckett, Matuszaka and Wakefield should be able to absorb that. But if the Big 4 starters keep going 7 and having the bullpen blow the game, the team could lose a lot more than the 12 or so games a mediocre 5th starter is likely to lose for them.

    Those that wanted to see Papelbon go 17-10 should realize that this assumes somebody can close out his victories. Sox don’t have that guy right now, except for Paps.

    Remember, Matuszaka’s pitch count may need to be controlled this year since he’s not used to pitching every 5th day. The worst thing that could happen to his confidence is to pitch 6 shutout innings and then have the Sox lose the game because the bullpen couldn’t hold the lead.

    As a closer, Paps could be a key figure in 45 wins. That’s not happening if he starts.

    Kudos to Theo for making the move while it’s still Spring Training instead of being proven wrong by May 15.


  57. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:03 pm thefliz

    ARE YOU KIDDING ME, CURT???

    Can you really not help yourself and have to “break the story” this on your blog before the team does? I’m sure the organization appreciates you trumping their official announcement.

    Why don’t you stop being such a shameless self promoter and focus the job you’ve failed at since 2005 — actually pitching you your potential.


  58. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:10 pm soxpatsbruinsceltics

    Hi curt .do you think maybe you should waited for the front office to anounce the papelbon move before you blogged on the subject ?


  59. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:11 pm menuhub

    This is the best news yet! PAP belongs in the Pen. The only other thing I hope Manny will sell his GRILL. http://www.menuhub.com


  60. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:14 pm bcpaul

    Hi Curt,

    Red Sox Nation is all giddy today with the news that Paps will be moved to the bullpen to soldify the closer spot. What do you think of this move? Are the Sox better off with Paps closing instead of starting? Do you forsee the Sox filling the 5th starter spot from within the organziation or is there any possibility that the Rocket Man will launch back to Boston and make this year’s rotation even that more impressive. Getty up!


  61. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:15 pm ralphkramden

    This should be good news for the Sox. There’s lots of good 5th starter possibilities.

    That said - why the heck are we getting this news smuggled out of the clubhouse, instead of hearing it from Francona or Theo? As much as the media hate it, I’m in favor of the Belichek model when it comes to personnel news - all funneled through one source; very disciplined. Red Sox nation is voracious for news, but it shouldn’t fall to the staff ace to be the disseminator of information.

    My $0.02. Probably not worth that much.


  62. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:15 pm mannybeingmanny

    i love papelbon in the closer role, i was freaking out this whole spring, wondering what they were going to decide I.E pineiro, timlin ect

    But on the other hand leaving pap as a starter and sending wily mo delcarmen and maybe hansen to washington for cordero sounds a bit better, as i dont think those three are going to blossom into anything special. but we shall see!


  63. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:16 pm mcusack

    I had to laugh at the comment with the photo of Pap in SI.COM Scorecard daily. It says: Jonathan Papelbon is still on the trading block since the Red Sox have not settled on a closer. I dun thin so.


  64. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:18 pm shiamunchi

    Curt:

    We are confused and perhaps you can help clear this up. With Paps as a starter, one of our best pitchers would pitch double (or more) innings than if he were a closer. Runs scored by an opponent in ANY inning can beat you - it really doesn’t matter if it’s the first or the ninth. Therefore, the starting role seems to be the better choice.

    I can see two counter-arguments, one psychological and one statistical.

    The psychological argument is that losing the game at the end, rather than the beginning, is tougher on everyone. I don’t believe that Theo and co., Moneyball types that they are, made the decision based only on this.

    The statistical argument is that the closer’s innings are more important because he is brought in only when the game ‘is on the line.’ But, on the other hand, closers are sometimes brought out early if a game has become a blow-out (in either direction), and that increases the importance of a starters’ innings, too. But I assume that some sort of statistical analysis of this type argues for Paps as the closer.

    Am I on the right track?

    Thanks for the wonderful Blog!


  65. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:23 pm conig25

    Wow never thought that this would happen. But it’s really exciting. Love to see Julian step into that 5 spot and really get to use ‘all’ his pitches as a starter. He is so much more effective that way. In the bullpen he was just a two pitch pitcher then as a starter he opened up and really did a good job.

    Snyder has been very good and should go to the bullpen yielding to Julians experience.


  66. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:24 pm petrole

    Curt,
    Game 7, 2001 World Series, Alfonso Soriano hit a home run off what looked to be a pretty good splitter. In your mind was it a bad pitch, or did Alfonso just go down and get it?


  67. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:26 pm diamonddave13

    Enough ballwashing in here? Geez…so thanks for your take on Paps. It was…um…obvious? I havent a clue why Im even reading your blog other than my twisted fascination with your twisted fascination with hearing yourself talk or reading your own words. Im a Sox fan and Im a fan of your pitching, but everything else I could do without. If you have a problem with the media (which is something you feel the need to repeat every time you’re on with D&C) then why even talk to them. Manny is the only one that seems to realize that nothing good can come from speaking with the media. Just pitch dude. That’s it.


  68. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:27 pm iamdoolittle

    Like most people, I’m excited about Pap’s return to the closer role. I have seen too many instances of a starter having the chance to win a game blown because of a bullpen screw up. Having Papelbon as the anchor of the bullpen makes me more confident that we can capitalize on the strength of this years starting rotation. On another note, I’m very excited to see what Julian Tavarez can do as a starter this year. I feel that he was misused in the bullpen last year. He didn’t seem comfortable coming into situations with inherited runners, and once he made a mistake in those situations, his control seemed to falter and he’d walk a lot of batters. However, when he is expected to pitch several innings, he seems to maintain his composure much better and better use his stuff. For example, he pitched several effective innings against Chicago during the very long extra innings game last year and even pitched a complete game against Toronto after our playoff hopes were extinguished. I look forward to seeing what he can do as a fifth starter.


  69. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:31 pm ih8nyy

    Great move, I just hope it doesn’t change the expected rotation of Dice-K in the # 3 slot. I have tickets to the 2nd home game and that will be disappointing if I don’t see his first game at Fenway.

    But it is a great move. The kid was lights out last season and he competes as well as anyone out there.


  70. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:31 pm mfaj5

    Schill-

    I love that you are now in a position to break news. That is just awesome.

    I’m watching/reading from the West Coast, so I am curious to know how much it is pissing off EEI and the papers that you are essentially leaving them in the dust?

    I appluad your efforts. Keep us informed!


  71. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:35 pm rdsxnation67

    I am glad it did not take a fiasco during the year to make this happen. Closing takes a special mentality, that Pap showed he had last year. From the looks of spring training, we could have Tavarez, or Snyder, or Lester if he gets stronger to round out the rotation.


  72. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:40 pm jdh2511

    So we’re going to trade 200 innings for 80 innings…Having a starter is much more important then having a closer. The closer is probabaly the most overrated player on the field, and I’m sure Pineiro or somebody could have closed until Timlin came back. Papelbon starting puts us in the position to win more games then him closing, and I honestly expected from Theo and Co. Watching Julian Tavarez in the 5th spot is not my idea of a good fix.


  73. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:44 pm dguadalupe

    hmm. I think this could be good for THIS year, but what about the next few years? can he stay healthy?


  74. on 22 Mar 2007 at 3:54 pm 09neurotic

    While I’m excited that a player would take the time to run a site like this and genuinely interact with his fans, I have to echo the concerns of a few commenters above who are hoping this post had prior approval from the front office. If it did, then fantastic and I’ll consider myself slapped down, but if it didn’t, I would expect that you may be hearing from them.


  75. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:00 pm johnnyfromburgerking1988

    Aye it’s Johnny From Burger King checking in here,
    this is the move we all expected in the beginning of the season. Joel Pinero wasn’t going to cut it and all of the other major league teams demanded that we trade our top farm talent. What scares me is that Tavarez is starting, I mean what if this guy runs into second base again and breaks his hand when he tried to tag the baserunner out? With a rotation of schilling, matsuzaka, beckett, wake, and (hopefully) lester, the AL east belongs to us! Let’s just be happy that foulke isn’t closing for us and attacking poor old johnny from burger king.

    -Nice job on the blog

    Johnny From Burger King


  76. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:01 pm idabomb333

    Why doesn’t anybody get that using a great pitcher like Papelbon in the starter role makes him more valuable? Starting pitchers get far more innings than closers. Even if we give a higher weight to “important” innings in save situations, the sheer number of innings pitched is just huge. Look at Tavarez vs Papelbon. Who’s better? It’s Papelbon, easily.

    Last season there was the added factor that Pap would have missed time in the conversion process. It made sense early last year to have him in the pen. But now there’s just no excuse. The team does better if the best available starting pitchers are the starting pitchers. I’m sure Santana would be a great closer too, but if the twins needed help in their pen, no one would suggest that.

    Sigh. I thought Theo was smarter than this.


  77. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:04 pm lar1208

    Sebagobill…..the kind of closer Papelbon is and the kind of closer Dick R-A-D-A-T-Z was are completely different. Pitching concepts, training, stats have changed so much in 40 years….and although Jonathan Papelbon’s success thus far has certainly kept Red Sox Nation remembering fondly the [not-yet-matched] excitement “THE MONSTER” brought to Fenway when striding toward the mound, he certainly has the stuff to get it done. But remember, saves are recorded different statistically now than they were then and there weren’t such things as pitch counts, etc. I’ll never think he’s better than The Monster was until he, too, can gun down 3 Hall of Famers in 10 pitches.

    Curt, thanks for the insight from the inside and best of luck to Jonathan!! Have a great year in whatever role seems right and hopefully we’ll get another title in ‘07!!


  78. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:04 pm scrap1

    Excellent news for my fantasy team. Thanks for keeping us all posted. What would we do without you?


  79. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:04 pm gnader

    Rarely in the history of the sport does a pitcher come along with stamina and the ability to throw in the mid 90’s with pinpoint accuracy - sort of in the mold of a Nolan Ryan, Roger Clemens and Curt Schilling. To designate someone with that type of talent (i.e. Papelbon), at the outset of his career, a closer, makes little sense to me. Sound like desparation!


  80. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:11 pm soxrooter

    Curt

    I was wondering when you were going to start focusing in on the 2007 season? This blog is a disaster in boston. You are crossing the line of player roles. You are posting messages about what the front office is going to do before Theo has the appropriate time to release information on his time frame. I am a fan of you as a pitcher on the mound every 5th day. I really don’t like you on the other 4 days. This is going to be a distraction to you and to your teammates. You don’t seem to care too much. Seems like you are trying to go out of your way to be a distraction. In all my years watching baseball players in this town I have never come across someone who wants the attention off the field the way you do. It is not a pleasant part of your personality. Now I am hearing that pressure from the clubhouse (nice way of saying players) is behind why papelbon is moving to closer role. I really hope at 40 and with your current weight you can stay healthy because you should know starting pitching is harder to find than relievers. If you aren’t the same pitcher this team is in big trouble. In a perfect world for me you would stop with the attention and focus on how your role has intensified in the last 24 hours. It is worries me that you are not ready for this. Good luck. If it doesn’t work out for you this year I wonder how many of these posts you will make and how many you respond to.


  81. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:15 pm natefrancis

    I’d like to see Kyle Snyder get a chance to start some games down in the Fens, while Jon gets his legs back under him. Based in no small part on what I’ve read here, I think it could be a golden opportunity for a good kid who deserves his shot.

    Bronson Arroyo got his, and ran with it - and I think every Sox fan had a special affection for him, because everyone loves the story of the “kid that finally made it”. I don’t think that Kyle would mind that sort of affection from Red Sox Nation, and I think he could earn it.

    Let him know we’re here pulling for him.


  82. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:16 pm leutbneot

    Hey Schill.

    I have to say, as a 3rd-gen Yankee fan (and a Democrat to boot), I wasn’t really prepared to enjoy this blog as much as I do. Despite being on the other side of the rivalry, I’ve always respected (and feared!) you as a top-flight pitcher, and it’s totally amazing to see this level of fan interaction on the part of a truly top-tier athelete. The baseball insight that you give in this blog really is unique. I’m fascinated by the art of pitching, and your descriptions are truly invaluable to fans like me.

    If you have a chance, I’d like to know what the whole rivalry feels like from a player’s perspective. I’m not a crazy, obnoxious rivalry supporter (like many fans from both NY and Beantown), but I definitely enjoy the heightened sense of tension that NY-BOS games have. Is it different facing the Yanks than other teams? What’s Yankee Stadium like, relative to Fenway? Are there any Yankees that you really respect or are friends with?

    Thanks again for this blog. You have totally won this Yankee fan over.


  83. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:17 pm recticularpig

    I think this is great. When he was healthy last year Paps was a lights out closer and that is what this team needs. If you look at the Yankees, Mo is a huge reason they have been so successful over the past decade.

    I can’t remember being this excited about the start of baseball season and I have great hopes for this particular Red Sox team. I was hoping you could answer one of the following questions:

    1. Has Josh Beckett done anything differently since coming to Boston to avoid the blister troubles he had with the Marlins ?

    2. Do you think this blog will change your approach with the media this year ?

    3. Why is closing so much harder on arms than being a starter ? Paps would have thrown way more pitches as a starter than he will as a closer, so what causes the extra arm stress ?

    Your blog has already become a daily must read for me and I look forward to following the season through it. Good luck this season !!


  84. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:22 pm mbings

    Perhaps they are just making room for Roger. ;)


  85. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:25 pm bloodybob

    Thank God. The kid proved he could be a lights out closer. I’m sorry, but they don’t come around too often. If it won;t harm his sshoulder, theis was the correct (and necessary decision). I hope that Tavares can continue his string of strong starts from last year. If not, Lester, Gabbard and Snyder have all looked pretty good this Spring…


  86. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:28 pm ralphkramden

    Just a followup to my previous reply - I was wrong in thinking this blog was the primary source of this news. Apparently ESPN had it before it appeared here.

    I’d still like to see Sox news disseminated with more discipline. But I was mistaken for faulting this blog for breaking this story.


  87. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:37 pm gamermp101

    Hey I’m new here, so this is the first post for me. Considering how good Paps served as Bostons closer last year, I think that this is a great move. I do however think that he would be more suited for the rotation, he is young and has been a starter for most of his baseball career, and fittingly he would be great as a starting pitcher in both now and in years to come.

    Personally, I felt that Boston should have went after Chad Cordero. Being a former Expos Fan I watched him pitch in Montreal and was very impressed with his stuff and the potential he had. I’m sure that if he had gone to Boston, they could have worked with him to make him a great closer for them in the years to come.


  88. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:39 pm hayesjoe

    for a pretty interesting take on the media in Boston, you could do worse than Boston Sports Media Watch.

    thoughts?


  89. on 22 Mar 2007 at 4:43 pm keepthefaith

    Curt,

    Wow. ‘07 Sox have amazing stats. Ample talent. The message boards focus on all the individual player angles, but we’ve all seen talented players choke.

    What will make ‘07RS a WS caliber TEAM different from ‘04?


  90. on 22 Mar 2007 at 5:11 pm timlin50

    //This blog is a disaster in boston//

    Actually quite the opposite. This blog is arguably the most popular blog in town. Practically every Red Sox blogger links to it and all the media outlets seem to be using it for information as well.

    And as far as it being a distraction to the team…seriously, how many of Curt’s teammates do you think log on and run to 38pitches.com to see what Curt has to say?


  91. on 22 Mar 2007 at 5:13 pm timlin50

    //What will make ‘07RS a WS caliber TEAM different from ‘04?//

    I feel like so many forget what a horrible season 2004 was for MOST of that season (prior, of course, to the playoffs).

    Anything can happen. The team has a group of great players who should do well.

    There aren’t ANY guarantees in life OR baseball.


  92. on 22 Mar 2007 at 5:21 pm bball21

    Curt,

    On the topic of closers, I was watching a Yankee game the other night and saw Mariano Rivera make Ryan Howard look silly with a CHANGEUP. He struck him out on a 2-2 change. Isn’t it pretty unusual for him to come up with a change up this late in his career?


  93. on 22 Mar 2007 at 5:23 pm elviselvisberg

    I hate the term “player hater”– 95% of the time, it’s a way to avoid a substantive response to criticism.

    But reading this thread, there’s some people who seem to be going way out of their way to prove that it has some substance behind it.

    There’s a ton of stuff you say that I will be pleased to disagree with. But as a Sox fan, it’s been a real treat to follow your career here. When athletes clam up or spout cliches, people complain; when athletes are outspoken, people tell them to shut up. What can you do. It’s terrific, as a fan, to hear a player willing to share insight about his approach to the game and various other matters.

    I hope you realize that, like the few bad apples in the media, the number of fans who sympathize with the loudest complainers is extremely small.

    Unless it works to psyche you up to prove people wrong. If that’s the case, you should be aware that everyone thinks your hometown, your religion, and Lou Gehrig are all stupid.


  94. on 22 Mar 2007 at 5:30 pm lou1277

    I am thrilled with his decision! Thanks so much for your take on the whole situation. Great site, by the way!


  95. on 22 Mar 2007 at 5:30 pm soxfanfromaz

    I know this is pure speculation and probably just wishful thinking, but do you think with Papelbon back in the pen, the Sox will go after Clemens that much harder? I know we have plenty of arms capable of handling the 5th spot in the rotation, but Clemens would fit into the rotation a lot easier now dont you think?

    Schilling
    Beckett
    Clemens
    Matsuzaka
    Wakefield

    With Papelbon coming in to close out games.

    WOW.


  96. on 22 Mar 2007 at 5:37 pm nysoxfan

    Curt,

    Great blog. Thank you.

    I was just wondering your opinion on the DirecTV/Cable dispute over the MLB Extra Innings package. As a Sox fan in upstate NY, I rarely get the chance to watch my Sox on TV without the EI package and now MLB is telling me that if I want to get the package I have to get DirecTV. That’s very nice, but I can’t get a signal at my home and I don’t want to switch from my cable provider even if I could. This doesn’t effect just Sox fans, but all baseball fans who do not live in the home broadcast area of their favorite team. Are the players even aware that this is happening and do they care that there are many, many unhappy fans?


  97. on 22 Mar 2007 at 6:02 pm ryssee

    Yippee!!! Papelbon is a rock star. This is a great way to start the season right.


  98. on 22 Mar 2007 at 6:16 pm isyank

    Curt:

    I have to say that what you are doing - getting closer to the Fans is great. I wish there where yankees that did this. Good luck this year (other than againist NYY)


  99. on 22 Mar 2007 at 6:30 pm papasote

    I gotta admit I was psyched to hear that Pap is back in the ‘pen. I’d love to see him starting eventually, for the strictly selfish reason that it’s so much fun to watch him shut guys down. 200 innings of that would be even better than 70ish. But I know that the Sox need a closer- a REAL closer- in order to make it into the postseason. And while stats may support Pap’s greater value in terms of winning as a very good starter instead of as a dominant closer, I feel like team psychology may kinda balance that out. I would imagine that, as a starter, you would be much less prone to trying to do too much with a real stopper available for the ninth inning. As in, now you don’t have to freak out if you don’t pitch into the ninth, and can just find the groove instead. Any merit to the thought?

    Also, I just got done reading Verducci’s article in SI about Matsuzaka-san’s refusal to ice his arm after any pitching activities. It totally flipped me out until they started explaining the theory a little bit, and I have to say it seems to make sense. Or at least that it could make sense for some players. Do you think there is room for change in the way a pitcher recuperates here in the States? Do you think anyone at the proffessional level has the minerals to buck the current system and give alternate methods a shot? Does your personal regimen include anything outlandish like that?


  100. on 22 Mar 2007 at 6:31 pm wa11c

    Curt—

    I’m a huge fan of yours from back in ‘93 when you were with the Phillies. I was just 5 years old then, but you guys got me loving baseball. Quite honestly, listening to the truly magical voice of Harry Kalas got me interested in sports broadcasting, which I’m doing now as a college freshman. Reading your last Q & A, in which you mentioned Harry, got me thinking…

    Let me get to the point: I was wondering if you’d be at all willing to be interviewed on the radio show I’m putting together on the student radio station. While I fully understand how unlikely this is, it would be such a tremendous honor, not to mention a boon to the show, which is just about to premiere.

    If you can e-mail or message me if you are interested, I would be more than happy to give you more details. (I believe my e-mail address is in my profile.) Either way, thanks a lot for doing this blog, Curt. I’m personally not a fan of the Sox, but I wish you the best of luck this season.

    - Sam


  101. on 22 Mar 2007 at 6:35 pm xcmatt79

    hey Curt!
    Quick question..
    Do you think the move of Papelbon to the Bullpen may pave the way, or atleast give a clearly route for the possibility of Clemens joining the sox in May/june-ish??

    Thanks again!
    -Matt


  102. on 22 Mar 2007 at 6:42 pm appledrums

    Curt, you’ve done a little relieving, including closing, yourself, which do you think is easier on the arm, the regular routine and consecutive off-days of starting, or the lower pitch-count but un-even routine of relieving?
    - Steve


  103. on 22 Mar 2007 at 6:45 pm henri100

    Curt:

    You should consider posting a link to Autism Speaks. It’s a great charity and with 1 in 150 recent births on the autism spectrum it’s a serious public health issue. On a more topical note, I think that this is a great move if his health permits.


  104. on 22 Mar 2007 at 6:46 pm tex22

    Curt
    You said you’d sell ice cream to see Roger return to Boston…..well I’d sell the Sprinkles!!! To see him come full circle, not to mention Roger is THE SOLE REASON I am a Sox fan would make this Texas gal absolutely put her baseball memorabilia on hock to get a ticket to see him pitch in Fenway AS a Red Sox.

    Im a Texan through and through except when it comes to baseball…Baseball is my 1st love in Sports…I grew up down the street from a little league field. I have seen Roger pitch in Yankee Stadium and at Minute Maid…in fact I was at the game he pitched the day his mom passed…and it was like she was right there cheering him on….he was awesome that night!

    If Roger were to choose to come to Boston….what are your feelings about his special treatment such as not traveling to away games? I don’t have alot of issues with it myself but wonder if other players do. I would think after putting in all those years that you get perks…

    See you in Arlington at The Rangers BallPark!
    Tex


  105. on 22 Mar 2007 at 6:49 pm thankusox04

    I’m just flabbergasted by all the negative responses I’m seeing about this news, not only on your blog but on the Red Sox board and such. I damn near hit my head on the roof when jumping up from the couch upon hearing the news that Paps was going to be our closer again. I immediately went to the Sox site, expecting to be able to celebrate with all of RSN, but instead, I see a bunch of negative remarks. ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME? Our ONLY “weakness” has just been erased, poof, GONE. This kid is a STUD who has ice in his veins, he’s a CLOSER. I’ve been praying for this since the day they announced he’d be a starter. Thank you baseball gods!!!

    With you at the top of a SICK rotation (anyone who says you are not the Curt you once were is either an ignornant fool, or a Yankee fan which is pretty much redundant, but I digress). You, Beckett (who I agree with you, he IS an ace in the making… more sooner than later too), DiceK (I know how competitive you are and wanting to have the “Ace” stats. I think he’s going to be neck and neck with you the entire season, which is definitely a good thing for all involved), Wakey and *gulp* Tavarez. I’ll admit, that dude scares me. However, the more I see Snyder, the more I am a Snyder believer so I know he can step right in if Tavarez goes psycho on us. Let’s not forget our beloved young lefty-Lester, just waiting in the wings.

    Take me out to the ballgame…..take me out to the pahhhhk. Buy me sushi and crackerjacks! HERE WE GO RED SOX, HERE WO GO!


  106. on 22 Mar 2007 at 6:59 pm ahounddog

    Hey Curt,

    Thanks for the forum. The Sawx needed to fill a hole and they did. It’s a long season and things will change along the way. Get off to a good start and build the momentum throughout the year.


  107. on 22 Mar 2007 at 7:05 pm unexpectedjourney

    Finally! Other than any medical concerns, I cannot belive it took this long to go back to the most effective closer that the Sox have had since Tom Gordon (exluding Mr. Foulke’s crazy and awesome postseason). Snyder, Taverez, Lester, they are all possibilities. But does this not open the door for a strong pitch to Clemens to fill the final rotation slot?!


  108. on 22 Mar 2007 at 7:06 pm morpheusfu

    Curt, great job buddy. Blog looks great and thanks for keeping us all updated on the Sox and 38studios.


  109. on 22 Mar 2007 at 7:11 pm bigpapi34

    Curt-

    First off, I’d like to say that I’m someone who enjoys the “outspoken” athletes. Guys like yourself, Boomer Wells, and Petey are refreshing to listen to, after hearing all the Bull Durham Crash Davis cliches that everyone else gives. And, being the fan of pitching that I am, I’m very much looking forward to your breaking down your starts like you did the other day.

    Two part question:

    I don’t know the numbers, but it seemed like Pap had a lot of games last season where he had to get more than 3 outs. Alot of teams protect their closers by only letting them throw 1 inning, and always start that inning with no baserunners. Eric Gagne comes to mind when he was running off his 80+ straight saves.

    Having a guy like Pap (or Foulkie in ‘04) who can put out fires in the 8th inning, and get four to six outs on some nights is great, but….

    ….how much more stress is put on a guy - both physically and mentally - if he has to do that, as opposed to getting just 3 outs and not inheriting baserunners?

    ….do you see Tito trying to make more of an effort to keep Pap out of the game before the 9th?

    Thanks…


  110. on 22 Mar 2007 at 7:24 pm 56thousandnewyorkers

    A hammer like Pap come few and far between. If he gets enough looks, he definitely has the stuff and the makeup to be Rivera-like. If Delcarmen and Hansen can get consistent, then look the hell out.


  111. on 22 Mar 2007 at 7:29 pm hartill

    Thanks a lot, Schill

    I’m gonna be a little less anxious at the end of games knowing Pap’s in the wings. He was extraordinary last year. I believe he’ll only get better.

    And for a first-timer to your blog, let me thank you for taking the time to put this together. I’ll be a regular reader. You obviously put a lot of thought into your entries.

    It is appreciated.


  112. on 22 Mar 2007 at 7:30 pm dadhadals

    I like it…I gotta admit, I was saddened at first only because I, like many, think he has great stuff and can be a dominant starter in this league. I also LOVE the fact that he’s coming in to shut down games sometimes with as little as 1 pitch.

    The kid will be great in his role and it will take a great deal of stress off us fans wondering who the closer will be and how they will work out. We’ve already seen what this kid can do and we like it.

    Give him our best and let’s get to some serious ass kickin’!!!!


  113. on 22 Mar 2007 at 7:55 pm slyder29

    First let me start with a comment and then post a question. I think Paps back to the end of the pen is a great idea. I feel that a quality closer should have two quailty pitches, whether is be fastball/change, fastball/cutter or in Paps’ case fastball/splitter. I don’t feel he has commander of his other pitches in this stage of his career to get guys out for 6, 7, even 8 inns. Now to my question…Schill…is Taverez the answer at the end of the rotation? Is he more valueable in the pen where he can be used in a number of different situations? If Lester is healthy will he take the 5th spot? Or is there help outside the organization? I won’t even metion a certain Texan, right now it just seems to far fetched….BTW great set-up on the website Curt…Thanks


  114. on 22 Mar 2007 at 8:21 pm ej65

    I am very excited by this news about Papelbon. I liked his attitude and the sound bites as reported on the article on MLB really looked positive about the choice. I also think this is good news for Tavares who seemed to really come alive as a starter late in the season. I was hesitant about the season with it looking like Tavares as closer, but now I am almost beside myself with excitement about this season. I haven’t felt this good since 2004


  115. on 22 Mar 2007 at 8:22 pm mediarojas45

    Let me 1st say, great F’n blog Mr. Schilling

    I really think this is the correct move. Paps was so great last year as the closer. A question for you Mr. Schilling , What do you think is more important for a teams success? 80 unbelieveable innings? (from a pitcher), or 200 good innings?


  116. on 22 Mar 2007 at 8:29 pm mapsox

    Mr. Schilling,

    First let me thank you for your kindness to my girlfriend and I at the New Stars for Young Stars II event at Jillian’s. It was a pleasure to meet you. I think this is great news for both Jonathan and the Sox. Jonathan seems to have that killer mentality that a closer needs. He enjoys mowing down opposing batters and truly loves the team, the city and its fans. He thrives off the emotion of Fenway and it’s faithful across the globe. My question to you Mr. Schilling, on paper currently our starting five look like the following:

    1. Schilling
    2. Beckett
    3. Matsuzaka
    4. Wakefield
    5. Tavarez

    As much as I thought Julian had a great run as a starter last year, is he durable enough for a 180+ inning season? Why not let Kason Gabbard take a crack at that 5 spot, he has really impressed me this off season, and that lineup would be killer with an Ace, 2 Aces in training, a Knuckleballer and an impressive lefty.